Evaluating Resources
The Internet can lead you to wonderful, inventive sites that are great
sources of information. The Internet can also lead you to misleading, inaccurate,
or totally bogus information. Your ability to tell good sites from bad is an important skill.
Several
criteria useful for evaluating information found on the Internet appears
below. Not only are these criteria useful for evaluating Internet resources,
but you can also apply them to virtually any information resource including
books and periodicals.
Remember, if you are unsure about the quality of information you find on
the Internet, ask your instructor or a librarian for assistance before
using the site for your research or assignment.
Consider the following criteria:
Click here for tips on where to look on
individual web pages for information to support your analysis and evaluation.
Accuracy, Reliability
- How reliable and free from error is the information?
Evaluate:
-
Is the information accurate?
-
Do editors verify facts and correct spelling and grammar?
-
Are the sources of information documented? Is a list of works cited or
bibliography provided? Are links to these materials provided?
-
Can you verify the information provided by checking other sources such
as books and periodicals.
-
How does the information fit with your existing knowledge on the topic?
The following pairs of sites show the range of information available on
the Internet for several specific topics. Choose a pair, and use the criteria listed above
to judge the relevance and comprehensiveness of each site.
Sample Sites:
Return to the top of this section.
Relevance, Comprehensiveness
- What topics are included? Is the information appropriate for your information need? Does the page provide
enough depth for your needs?
Evaluate:
-
Who is the intended audience for this site?
-
Is the information useful?
-
Does it make a significant addition to your research?
-
Are the topics included explored in depth?
-
Is coverage appropriate for your needs?
-
Is original information presented, or are other documents and links simply
repackaged?
The following pair of sites illustrates the range of information available
on the Internet for several specific topics. Choose a pair, and use the criteria listed above
to judge the relevance and comprehensiveness of each site.
Sample Sites:
Return to the top of this section.
Timeliness - Is the content of
the work up-to-date?
Evaluate:
-
Are dates clearly presented to the reader?
-
Is the meaning of the dates provided explicitly stated?
On what date was the information first written
or created?
On what date was the information placed on
the Internet?
On what date was the information last revised?
-
Are the links active and kept current?
The following pair of sites illustrates the range of information available
on the Internet from dictionaries. Choose a pair, and use the criteria listed above
to judge the relevance and comprehensiveness of each site.
Sample Sites:
Return to the top of this section.
Authority - What are the author's
qualifications for writing on this subject?
Evaluate:
-
Can the author of the site be easily identified?
-
Is the author a known and respected organization (corporate, government,
or non-profit)?
-
Does information about the author demonstrate her or his education, training,
affiliations, and/or experience in a field relevant to the information?
-
Is contact information provided for the author (address, e-mail address,
etc.)?
-
Can the information presented about the author be verified in other sources
such as printed reference tools (Who's Who, etc.)?
-
What is the relationship between the author and the sponsor/publisher?
-
Is it a personal home page or an official page from an organization or
other institution? Web pages with /~name/ in their URL's may actually be
personal home pages. The information may not be less authoritative, but
you may wish to give the page some additional scrutiny.
-
Is the author the original creator of the information?
-
What information can be inferred from the site's URL to determine sponsorship
of the site? For example:
non-profit organization=.org
government department or agency=.gov, .state.xx.us
(for example, .state.sd.us = South Dakota)
educational institution=.edu
commercial entity=.com
internet service provider=.net
military affiliation=.mil
country code=.xx (for example, .au = Australia or .kr
= Korea)
The following pairs of sites illustrate range of information available
on the Internet on several specific topics. Choose a pair, and use the criteria listed above
to judge the relevance and comprehensiveness of each site.
Sample Sites:
Return to the top of this section.
Objectivity - Is the information
presented with a minimum of bias?
Evaluate:
-
To what extent is the information presented an attempt to sway the opinion
of the reader?
-
Is the information biased?
-
Are various sides of the topic or issue presented?
-
Is the site used to sell or advertise a product or service?
-
Who sponsors the site? Governmental or educational sites are less likely
to present biased information than company or organizational are. (Use
the domain name at the end of the address to determine, e.g., .edu, .gov,
.com, .net, .org, .mil, etc.)
The following pairs of sites illustrate the range of information available
on the Internet for several specific topics. Choose a pair, and use the criteria listed above
to judge the relevance and comprehensiveness of each site.
Sample Sites:
Where to find the answers
Well designed web pages usually share some characteristics:
Header/Footer - Information at the top or bottom of
each web page should be provided. This should include the author's name,
affiliation, and contact information (electronic or traditional).
Links - Links to the home page of the document and, possibly,
links to other relevant portions of the site should be easily located.
Links should be working and up-to-date.
Dates - Dates indicating when the information was originally
created, placed on the Internet, and/or last revised should be included.
An explanation of each date should be included.
Back to Top


For more information contact:
Reference Services
Hilton M. Briggs Library, South Dakota
State University
Box 2115, Brookings, SD 57007-1098
Telephone: (605) 688-5570, Fax: (605)
688-6133
E-mail: sdsu_blref@sdstate.edu
Page content created 8 December 1999 by Nancy J. Marshall,
updated 17 November 2003 by njm.